BACKGROUND: Early endoscopic evaluation is recommended for assessment of postoperative recurrence (POR) of Crohn's disease (CD) but no further monitoring recommendations are available. AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome of patients without endoscopic POR at first endoscopic assessment. METHODS: Retrospective four-centre study including consecutive CD patients with ileocolonic resection (ICR) without endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts score i0-i1) at first endoscopic assessment performed within 18 months from ICR. All patients had a clinical follow-up ≥24 months and at least one further endoscopic assessment. Main outcomes were endoscopic, clinical and surgical POR, need for rescue therapy and "delayed POR" (any need for rescue therapy or clinical or surgical POR) during follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 183 patients were included (79% with risk factors for POR, 44% without postoperative prophylaxis). Endoscopic POR was observed in 42% of patients. Clinical POR-free survival was 89.4% and 81.5% at 3 and 5 years, and delayed POR-free survival was 76.9% and 63.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, postoperative prophylaxis (HR .55; 95% CI .325-.942) and active smoking (HR 1.72; 95%CI 1.003-2.962) were independent risk factors for clinical POR, whereas presence of mild endoscopic lesions at index ileocolonoscopy (i1) was the only risk factor for delayed POR (HR 1.824; 95% CI 1.108-3.002). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term risk of POR among patients with no or mild endoscopic lesions at first ileocolonoscopy after surgery is steadily low, being higher among smokers, in the absence of postoperative prophylaxis and when mild endoscopic lesions are observed in the first endoscopic assessment.
Background: The usefulness of thiopurines has been poorly explored in pouchitis and other pouch disorders. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine as maintenance therapy in inflammatory pouch disorders. Design: This was a retrospective and multicentre study. Methods: We included patients diagnosed with inflammatory pouch disorders treated with azathioprine in monotherapy. Effectiveness was evaluated at 1 year and in the long term based on normalization of stool frequency, absence of pain, faecal urgency or fistula discharge (clinical remission), or any improvement in these symptoms (clinical response). Endoscopic response was evaluated using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). Results: In all, 63 patients were included [54% males; median age, 49 (28-77) years]. The therapy was used to treat pouchitis (n = 37) or Crohn's disease of the pouch (n = 26). The rate of clinical response, remission and non-response at 12 months were 52%, 30% and 18%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range 11-55), 19 patients (30%) were in clinical remission, and 45 (66%) stopped therapy. Endoscopic changes were evaluated in 19 cases. PDAI score decreased from 3 (range 2-4) to 1 (range 0-3). In all, 21 patients (33%) presented adverse events and 16 (25%) needed to stop therapy. Conclusion: Azathioprine may be effective in the long term for the treatment of inflammatory pouch disorders and could be included as a therapeutic option.
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for developing pancreatitis due to thiopurines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are not clearly identified. AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the predictive pharmacogenetic risk of pancreatitis in IBD patients treated with thiopurines. METHODS: We conducted an observational pharmacogenetic study of acute pancreatitis events in a cohort study of IBD patients treated with thiopurines from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry biobank of GETECCU. Samples were obtained and the CASR, CEL, CFTR, CDLN2, CTRC, SPINK1, CPA1, and PRSS1 genes, selected based on their known association with pancreatitis, were fully sequenced. RESULTS: Ninety-five cases and 105 controls were enrolled, 57% were women. Median age at pancreatitis diagnosis was 39 years. We identified 81 benign variants (50 in cases and 67 in controls) and a total of 35 distinct rare pathogenic and unknown significance variants (10 in CEL, 21 in CFTR, 1 in CDLN2, and 3 in CPA1). None of the cases or controls carried pancreatitis-predisposing variants within the CASR, CPA1, PRSS1, and SPINK1 genes, nor a pathogenic CFTR mutation. Four different variants of unknown significance were detected in the CDLN and CPA1 genes; one of them was in the CDLN gene in a single patient with pancreatitis, and 3 in the CPA1 gene in 5 controls. After the analysis of the variants detected, no significant differences were observed between cases and controls. CONCLUSION: In patients with IBD, genes known to cause pancreatitis seem not to be involved in thiopurine-related pancreatitis onset.
BACKGROUND: The advent of new therapeutic agents and the improvement of supporting care might change the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and avoid colectomy. AIMS: To evaluate the colectomy-free survival and safety of a third-line treatment in patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids and who failed either infliximab or ciclosporin. METHODS: Multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids who had failed infliximab or ciclosporin and received a third-line treatment during the same hospitalisation. Patients who stopped second-line treatment due to disease activity or adverse events (AEs) were eligible. We assessed short-term colectomy-free survival by logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for long-term assessment. RESULTS: Among 78 patients, 32 received infliximab and 46 ciclosporin as second-line rescue treatment. Third-line treatment was infliximab in 45 (58%), ciclosporin in 17 (22%), tofacitinib in 13 (17%) and ustekinumab in 3 (3.8%). Colectomy was performed in 29 patients (37%) during follow-up (median 21 weeks). Of the 78 patients, 32 and 18 were in clinical remission at, respectively, 12 and 52 weeks. At the last visit, 25 patients were still on third-line rescue treatment, while 12 had stopped it due to clinical remission. AEs were reported in 26 (33%) patients. Two patients died (2.6%), including one following colectomy. CONCLUSION: Third-line rescue treatment avoided colectomy in over half of the patients with ASUC and may be considered a therapeutic strategy.
Colectomy , Colitis, Ulcerative , Cyclosporine , Gastrointestinal Agents , Infliximab , Humans , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Infliximab/adverse effects , Male , Female , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Acute Disease , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index
BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster (HZ) is a prevalent disease caused by the reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and associated with chronic morbidity, particularly with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with an increased risk of HZ, mainly when immunosuppressive treatment (IMT) is used. However, studies assessing the risk of HZ in IBD are scarce. AIMS: To evaluate the incidence rate and risk factors of HZ in IBD. METHODS: Retrospective study in IBD patients with a positive VVZ serology from two referral hospitals from the area of Barcelona. Diagnosis of HZ and its clinical features were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 398 IBD patients with a positive IgG-VVZ serology were identified. Fifty-eight percent of the patients received IMT (46.5% immunosuppressants monotherapy, 20.6% biologics monotherapy and, 32.7% combination therapy). After a median follow-up of 71 months (IQR 41.5-138.0), 17 (4.3%) patients developed HZ (cumulative incidence of 5.2 per 1000 person-year), 12 of them (70.6%) while receiving IMT. Median age at HZ episode was 38 years (IQR 27.5-52.5). Two (11%) developed PHN. Biological therapy was the only risk factor for developing HZ (OR 3.8 IC 95% 1.3-11.5; p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: HZ is quite prevalent in IBD, occurring at early ages and particularly among patients using IMT. NPH appears to occur in a notable proportion of cases.
Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC) but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF. Objectives: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Results: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi and 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4% in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. Conclusion: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). RESULTS: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi, 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4%, in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. CONCLUSION: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.
Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents. Data from the ENEIDA registry Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC), but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF.
OBJECTIVE: the recommendations of the Spanish Ministry of Health on vaccination in risk groups include mesalazine among the treatments with a possible negative effect on its effectiveness. However, this is not the recommendation of most experts. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of mesalazine on the humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: VACOVEII is a Spanish, prospective, multicenter study promoted by GETECCU, which evaluates the effectiveness of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with IBD. This study includes IBD patients who have recieved the full vaccination schedule and without previous COVID-19 infection. Seroconversion was set at 260 BAU/mL (centralized determination) and was assessed 6 months after full vaccination. In this subanalysis of the study, we compare the effectivenes of the vaccine between patients treated with mesalazine and patients without treatment. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients without immunosuppressive therapy were included, of which 32 did not receive any treatment and 92 received only mesalazine. Six months after full vaccination, no significant differences are observed in the mean concentrations of IgG anti-S between both groups. In the multivariate analysis, antibody titers were independently associated with the use of mRNA vaccines and with SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine does not have a negative effect on the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in IBD patients.
BACKGROUND: Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab are approved for the management of Crohn's disease [CD]. Data on which one would be the most beneficial option when anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] agents fail are limited. AIMS: To compare the durability, effectiveness, and safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab after anti-TNF failure or intolerance in CD. METHODS: CD patients from the ENEIDA registry who received vedolizumab or ustekinumab after anti-TNF failure or intolerance were included. Durability and effectiveness were evaluated in both the short and the long term. Effectiveness was defined according to the Harvey-Bradshaw index [HBI]. The safety profile was compared between the two treatments. The propensity score was calculated by the inverse probability weighting method to balance confounder factors. RESULTS: A total of 835 patients from 30 centres were included, 207 treated with vedolizumab and 628 with ustekinumab. Dose intensification was performed in 295 patients. Vedolizumab [vs ustekinumab] was associated with a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.02-3.21), adjusted by corticosteroids at baseline [HR 1.27; 95% CI: 1.00-1.62], moderate-severe activity in HBI [HR 1.79; 95% CI: 1.20-2.48], and high levels of C-reactive protein at baseline [HR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10]. The inverse probability weighting method confirmed these results. Clinical response, remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission were higher with ustekinumab than with vedolizumab. Both drugs had a low risk of adverse events with no differences between them. CONCLUSION: In CD patients who have failed anti-TNF agents, ustekinumab seems to be superior to vedolizumab in terms of durability and effectiveness in clinical practice. The safety profile is good and similar for both treatments.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Crohn Disease , Ustekinumab , Humans , Ustekinumab/therapeutic use , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Remission Induction , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Registries , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies
A 48-year-old man with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis 18 years ago, under immunosuppressive treatment with azathioprine in the last 6 years due to corticosteroid dependence, was admitted to the Emergency Department due to fever of one weeks evolution. Blood tests showed thrombocytopenia, CRP 96.9mg/L, ferritin 3021ng/mL and hypertriglyceridemia. Blood and urine cultures were negative. Viral serologies (hepatitis B and C, HIV, parvovirus, CMV, HSV), atypical bacteria (Borrelia, Chlamydia, Coxiella) and screening for latent tuberculosis were also negative. Thoracoabdominal CT scan only showed splenomegaly. The bone marrow aspirate revealed immature lymphoid cells and a hemophagocyte figure, fulfilling the criteria for hemophagocytic syndrome, starting corticosteroid therapy at a dose of 1mg/Kg. Subsequently, the existence of an intrasinusoidal CD3 + CD5- lymphoid infiltrate and a FISH study with isochromosome 7q was reported, a characteristic pattern of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL). The study was completed with liver biopsy appreciating a 70% infiltration of T lymphocytes (50% gamma-delta) therefore the diagnosis was confirmed. Chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide) was started with the aim of considering hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Unfortunately, the patient died 6 months later. (AU)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Lymphoma, T-Cell/complications , Lymphoma, T-Cell/drug therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Immunocompromised Host
BACKGROUND: The response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination decreases in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, specially under anti-TNF treatment. However, data on medium-term effectiveness are limited, specially using new recommended seroconversion rate (>260BAU/mL). Our aim was to evaluate the 6-month>260 BAU-seroconversion rate after full vaccination and after booster-dose. METHODS: VACOVEII is a Spanish multicenter, prospective study promoted by GETECCU. IBD patients full vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and without previous COVID-19 infection, treated or not with immunosuppressants, were included. The booster dose was administered 6 months after the full vaccination. Seroconversion was set at 260BAU/mL, according to most recent recommendations and was assessed 6 months after the full vaccination and 6 months after booster-dose. RESULTS: Between October 2021 and March 2022, 313 patients were included (124 no treatment or mesalazine; 55 immunomodulators; 87 anti-TNF; 19 anti-integrin; and 28 ustekinumab). Most patients received mRNA-vaccines (86%). Six months after full vaccination, overall seroconversion rate was 44.1%, being significantly lower among patients on anti-TNF (19.5%, p<0.001) and ustekinumab (35.7%, p=0.031). The seroconversion rate after booster was 92%. Again, anti-TNF patients had a significantly lower seroconversion rate (67%, p<0.001). mRNA-vaccine improved seroconversion rate (OR 11.720 [95% CI 2.26-60.512]). CONCLUSION: The full vaccination regimen achieves suboptimal response in IBD patients, specially among those anti-TNF or ustekinumab. The booster dose improves seroconversion rate in all patients, although it remains limited in those treated with anti-TNF. These results reinforce the need to prioritize future booster doses in patients on immunosuppressants therapy, specially under anti-TNF, and using mRNA-vaccines.
BACKGROUND: Faecal calprotectin (FC) shows an excellent correlation with endoscopic and histological activity of ulcerative colitis (UC) and it is the best predictor of clinical relapse. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of modifying the dose of mesalazine based on FC levels, in clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospective, single-centre study in UC patients in clinical remission while treated with mesalazine which dosage was decreased (DOWN) or increased (UP) according to FC levels. The main endpoint was the long-term maintenance of clinical remission. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were included (39 DOWN, 17 UP). In the DOWN group, the median baseline dose of mesalazine was 3.6g/day and the median baseline FC was 36µg/g. After a median follow-up of 22 months, 28% required rescue therapy. The cumulative relapse-free survival after tapering was 91% and 82% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In the UP group, the median baseline dose of mesalazine was 2.4g/day, with a median baseline FC of 524µg/g. After a median follow-up of 12 months, 29% required rescue therapy. The cumulative relapse-free survival after dose increase was 86% and 72% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalazine dose modification based on FC monitoring seems to be a safe strategy in patients with UC in clinical remission, with a probability of clinical relapse around 20% at two years.
Background: Oral anticoagulation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, particularly gastrointestinal bleeding, leading to treatment withdrawal in up to 50% of patients and putting them at risk of embolic events. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) can be an alternative to chronic anticoagulation. We aim to describe the impact of LAAC in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) or chronic iron deficiency anaemia (CIDA) on healthcare resources consumption. Methods: Observational retrospective study of patients who underwent LAAC for GIB or CIDA at a single centre. Results: Nineteen patients with a median age of 74 years and a median Charlson score of six points were included in the study. Angiodysplasias were the most frequent cause of GIB or CIDA. The procedural success rate of LAAC was 100% with a median anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatment duration of 92 days. One year after the LAAC, we found a significant improvement in the lowest haemoglobin concentration and a reduction in the number of red blood cells transfusion, hospital admissions due to GIB and CIDA and the number of endoscopic examinations. One patient died due to a pulmonary thromboembolism. No deaths related to GIB were observed. Conclusions: LAAC seems to be a safe and effective alternative to anticoagulation in patients with GIB or CIDA. (AU)
Introducción: La anticoagulación oral en la fibrilación auricular no valvular se asocia a un incremento del riesgo de sangrado, especialmente gastrointestinal, lo que conlleva la retirada del tratamiento hasta en el 50% de los pacientes e implica un mayor riesgo de padecer un evento embólico. El cierre de la orejuela izquierda (COI) puede ser una alternativa a la anticoagulación crónica. Nuestro objetivo es describir el impacto del COI en pacientes con sangrado gastrointestinal (SGI) o anemia crónica ferropénica (ACF) en el consumo de recursos sanitarios. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a COI por SGI o ACF. Resultados: Diecinueve pacientes con una mediana de edad de 74años y una mediana del índice de Charlson de 6puntos fueron incluidos en el estudio. Las angiodisplasias fueron la causa más frecuente de SGI o ACF. La tasa de éxito técnico del COI fue del 100%, con una duración mediana del tratamiento anticoagulante y antiagregante de 92días. Tras un año del COI, se observó una mejoría significativa del valor mínimo de hemoglobina, así como una reducción en el número de transfusiones de concentrados de hematíes, en la necesidad de hospitalización por SGI o ACF y en el número de endoscopias. Un paciente falleció debido a un tromboembolismo pulmonar. Ningún paciente falleció por SGI. Conclusiones: El COI parece una alternativa segura y efectiva a la anticoagulación en pacientes con SGI o ACF. (AU)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency , Retrospective Studies , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Anticoagulants
A 48-year-old man with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis 18 years ago, under immunosuppressive treatment with azathioprine in the last 6 years due to corticosteroid dependence, was admitted to the Emergency Department due to fever of one week's evolution. Blood tests showed thrombocytopenia, CRP 96.9mg/L, ferritin 3021ng/mL and hypertriglyceridemia. Blood and urine cultures were negative. Viral serologies (hepatitis B and C, HIV, parvovirus, CMV, HSV), atypical bacteria (Borrelia, Chlamydia, Coxiella) and screening for latent tuberculosis were also negative. Thoracoabdominal CT scan only showed splenomegaly. The bone marrow aspirate revealed immature lymphoid cells and a hemophagocyte figure, fulfilling the criteria for hemophagocytic syndrome, starting corticosteroid therapy at a dose of 1mg/Kg. Subsequently, the existence of an intrasinusoidal CD3 + CD5- lymphoid infiltrate and a FISH study with isochromosome 7q was reported, a characteristic pattern of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL). The study was completed with liver biopsy appreciating a 70% infiltration of T lymphocytes (50% gamma-delta) therefore the diagnosis was confirmed. Chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide) was started with the aim of considering hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Unfortunately, the patient died 6 months later.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data on the outcomes after switching from adalimumab (ADA) originator to ADA biosimilar are limited. The aim was to compare the treatment persistence, clinical efficacy, and safety outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients who maintained ADA originator vs. those who switched to ADA biosimilar. METHODS: Patients receiving ADA originator who were in clinical remission at standard dose of ADA originator were included. Patients who maintained ADA originator formed the non-switch cohort (NSC), and those who switched to different ADA biosimilars constituted the switch cohort (SC). Clinical remission was defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw index ≤4 in Crohn's disease and a partial Mayo score ≤2 in ulcerative colitis. To control possible confounding effects on treatment discontinuation, an inverse probability treatment weighted proportional hazard Cox regression was performed. RESULTS: Five hundred and twenty-four patients were included: 211 in the SC and 313 in the NSC. The median follow-up was 13 months in the SC and 24 months in the NSC (p < 0.001). The incidence rate of ADA discontinuation was 8% and 7% per patient-year in the SC and in the NSC, respectively (p > 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, switching from ADA originator to ADA biosimilar was not associated with therapy discontinuation. The incidence rate of relapse was 8% per patient-year in the SC and 6% per patient-year in the NSC (p > 0.05). Six percent of the patients had adverse events in the SC vs. 5% in the NSC (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Switching to ADA biosimilar did not impair patients' outcomes in comparison with maintaining on the originator.
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Drug Substitution , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
